Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3

[Theodore Tso]

On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:15:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> And hardware gets better.  If Intel & AMD come out with a 16k pagesize
> option in a couple of years we'll look pretty dumb.  If the problems which
> you're presently having with that controller get sorted out in the next
> generation of the hardware, we'll also look pretty dumb.

Unfortunately, this isn't a problem with hardware getting better, but
a willingness to break backwards compatibility.

x86_64 uses a 4k page size to avoid breaking 32-bit applications.  And
unfortunately, iirc, even 64-bit applications are continuing to depend
on 4k page alignments for things like the text and bss segments.  If
the userspace ELF and other compiler/linker specifications were
appropriate written so they could handle 16k pagesizes, maybe 5 years
from now we could move to a 16k pagesize.  But this is going to
require some coordination between the userspace binutils folks and
AMD/Intel in order to plan such a migration.

							- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/