Re: [patch] uml: fix cmpxchg warnings in -mm

[Jeff Dike]

On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:27:48PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Then atomic.h should include system.h and not rely on someone else doing it.
> Yes - then system.h may be included twice but that's ok.

I tried that - Andi didn't like it.  My current thinking is to pull the
cmpxchg stuff out of system.h into its own header since I don't see
any existing natural place to put it.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/