RE: Fw: [PATCH] ia64: race flushing icache in do_no_page path

[Rohit Seth]

 Hi Hugh,

-----Original Message-----
From: Hugh Dickins [mailto:hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 10:34 PM
To: Rohit Seth
Cc: Nick Piggin; Mike Stroyan; Andrew Morton; Luck, Tony;
linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH] ia64: race flushing icache in do_no_page path

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Rohit Seth wrote:

> lazy_mmu_prot_update was added specifically for notifying change in 
> protection.  So, in a way it is closer to update_mmu_cache (Which is 
> for change in mappings itself).  Though for ia64 implementation, this 
> ends up flushing the icaches when needed.

>The ia64 implementation is the only one which has any use for it, 

Even Itanium didn't need it for almost 5 years :)  Though I think archs that
have incoherent I & D caches could be (theoritically) exposed to same
(original) mprotect code path bug that triggered this API.

>and 
>it's only interested when it's executable i.e. "lazy_mmu_prot_update"
>is a name concealing some overdesign.

You are right that ia64 is only interested in whne the execute permissions
kick in (and FWIW ia64 used to use update_mmu_cache API to do what it is now
doing lazy_mmu_prot_update).  Though the idea was to design an API that any
arch can use to know when ever there is change in protections on a mapping.

Cheers,
-rohit


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/