Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7

[S.ÃaÄlar Onur]

28 Nis 2007 Cts tarihinde, Ingo Molnar ÅunlarÄ yazmÄÅtÄ: 
> * S.ÃaÄlar Onur <caglar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If you want some more output/info etc. please just say, i have both v6
> > and v7 available.
>
> could you try the auto-renice patch ontop of -v7:
>
>   http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-auto-renice.patch
>
> does this make it behave like -v6?

Ingo, please ignore my first report until i found a proper way to reproduce 
the slowness cause currently CFS-v7, CFS-v7 + "renice patch", CFS-v7 + renice 
+ your private mail suggestions and CFS-v6 + "PI support for futexes patch" 
seems works equally (which is a good thing so X renicing seems really not 
needed, and there were no regression instead of my daydreams) or im too tired 
to understand the differences.

-- 
S.ÃaÄlar Onur <caglar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/

Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.