[PATCH] [25/48] x86_64: Introduce load_TLS to the "for" loop.

[Andi Kleen]

From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

GCC (4.1 at least) unrolls it anyway, but I can't believe this code
was ever justifiable.  (I've also submitted a patch which cleans up
i386, which is even uglier).

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 include/asm-x86_64/desc.h |   11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h
+++ linux/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h
@@ -135,16 +135,13 @@ static inline void set_ldt_desc(unsigned
 	(info)->useable		== 0	&& \
 	(info)->lm		== 0)
 
-#if TLS_SIZE != 24
-# error update this code.
-#endif
-
 static inline void load_TLS(struct thread_struct *t, unsigned int cpu)
 {
+	unsigned int i;
 	u64 *gdt = (u64 *)(cpu_gdt(cpu) + GDT_ENTRY_TLS_MIN);
-	gdt[0] = t->tls_array[0];
-	gdt[1] = t->tls_array[1];
-	gdt[2] = t->tls_array[2];
+
+	for (i = 0; i < GDT_ENTRY_TLS_ENTRIES; i++)
+		gdt[i] = t->tls_array[i];
 } 
 
 /*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/