Re: [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu

[Andi Kleen]

On Monday 30 April 2007 13:16:42 Jan Kiszka wrote:
> There are two callers of __unlazy_fpu, unlazy_fpu and __switch_to, and
> none of them appear to require additional preempt_disable/enable here.
> Let's open-code save_init_fpu in __unlazy_fpu to save a few ops.

Both patches added thanks
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/