Re: Linux 2.6.21

[Adrian Bunk]

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:01:38AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>...
> If bugs should be reported to the mailing list, then they
> should just get rid of bugzilla because it's aparently
> serving as a garbage bin.

The first question is not "Bugzilla" but "Does bug tracking make sense?".

Many bug reports to linux-kernel get zero attention and are lost without 
tracking. Is losing bug reports OK or do we need a tracking of bugs?

Tracking means:
- not to miss bug reports
- record discussions and the status of the bugs
- the real value comes from:
  provide useful reports like "all open ACPI bugs" or "all 2.6.21-rc 
  regressions" to people who are actually working on fixing the bugs

I was tracking 2.6.21-rc regressions.
Some people said this was useful.

Manually tracking of three dozen regressions plus sending regular sorted 
reports was at the limit of what I am able to handle manually without 
any tracking tool.

There are two different questions that seem to often be mixed in 
discussions:

The first question is:
Does it make sense to track kernel bugs?

If no, there's no need to discuss Bugzilla or other tools.

If yes, the second question is:
Which tracking tool would make sense for the Linux kernel?
This could be Bugzilla, the Debian bug tracking system, or even 
something written from scratch.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/