Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions

[David Rientjes]

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:

> it's just a prototype, so no code is generated by declaring one
> to an unused (or even non-existant) function.
> 
> Or are you using some oddball compiler that warns about this?
> 

If you consider gcc to be oddball, yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/