Re: to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)

[Jeff Garzik]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Yeah, a new-id patch is a pretty critical bugfix if you happen to have that
> hardware.  I'll get all these into 2.6.22 by whatever means and will adopt
> your advice in future.
>
> Probably these should go into -stable too, but I don't know what
> Greg&Chris's position is on new device IDs.

I don't know either.  But a one-line ID patch is pretty painless 
considering the gain, so I would vote for stable@xxxxxxxxxx taking such 
patches.

If it's more than one line added per ID though, NAK for -stable, IMO...

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/