Re: BAD_SG_DMA panic in aha1542

[Bob Tracy]

rct wrote:
> Apologies to all concerned for an unfortunate delay in resolving this.
> (...)
> I'll go retrieve a more conservatively-configured source tree (closer to
> what DSL-N uses) and start over...

Success with the Debian 2.6.18-4-486 build, which is known to work
almost as well on the test platform as the 2.6.12 kernel that DSL-N
comes with.  I used an older compiler than Debian used for their
production build, so I binary-patched the aha1542.ko and sr_mod.ko
files so insmod wouldn't complain about different vermagic strings.

That's as close as it gets without redoing everything from scratch.
I'll give Alan's and James' patches a go within the next 13 hours.

(Alan: what *else* would you name a variable associated with a bounce
buffer besides Zebedee?  Thanks for the occasion to smile...)

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Tracy                   WTO + WIPO = DMCA? http://www.anti-dmca.org
rct@xxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/