Re: [patches] [PATCH] [28/34] i386: pte xchg optimization

[Jan Beulich]

>>> Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> 30.04.07 17:50 >>>
>
>From: Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>In situations where page table updates need only be made locally, and there is
>no cross-processor A/D bit races involved, we need not use the heavyweight
>xchg instruction to atomically fetch and clear page table entries.  Instead,
>we can just read and clear them directly.

I always wondered why the xchg is necessary here at all. If the process of
tearing down a page table entry has started, other users of the mapped
linear address are broken anyway - why is it necessary to still monitor the
effect they may have on the A/D bits, unless this is a transient tear down?

Checking for the uses of ptep_get_and_clear, I would judge that the use in
change_pte_range() may in fact need the xchg, but the uses in
vunmap_pte_range() and zap_pte_range() shouldn't.

Jan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/