Re: [RFC 2/3] SLUB: Implement targeted reclaim and partial listdefragmentation
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Sat May 05 2007 - 11:43:43 EST
On Sat, 5 May 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> clameter@xxxxxxx writes:
> >
> > NOTE: This patch is for conceptual review. I'd appreciate any feedback
> > especially on the locking approach taken here. It will be critical to
> > resolve the locking issue for this approach to become feasable.
>
> Do you have any numbers on how this improves dcache reclaim under memory pressure?
How does one measure something like that?
I wanted to first make sure that the thing is sane. If there is a gaping
race here then I may have to add more code to cover that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/