RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 8 May 2007, Tim Chen wrote:

> I tried the slub-patches and the avoid atomic overhead patch against
> 2.6.21-mm1.  It brings the TCP_STREAM performance for SLUB to the SLAB
> level.  The patches not mentioned in the "series" file did not apply
> cleanly to 2.6.21-mm1 and I skipped most of those.  

Ahhh. Great. The patches not mentioned should not be applied corredct.

> Without skip atomic overhead patch, the throughput drops by 1 to 1.5%.
> 
> The change from slub_min_order=0 slub_max_order=4 
> to slub_min_order=6 slub_max_order=7 did not make much difference in
> my tests.

Allright. I will then put that patch in.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/