Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11(PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)

[Greg KH]

On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:38:46PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007 08:27:34 -0700 (PDT),
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > And no, we should not do it at the device core level. In fact, I don't 
> > think we should do it at that level at all. 
> > 
> > I'm pretty sure that the performance problems are at individual device 
> > drivers, and that the right solution is to thread at *that* level. Not 
> > higher up.
> 
> These are two different problems:
> 
> 1. Probing taking long for individual device drivers. I agree, this
> should be solved at the driver level.

For your bus perhaps, but not for PCI.

> 2. Sheer volume of devices on a bus. Even if the indivdual probing
> doesn't take long, having all devices probed one after the other may
> take a lot of time. Putting the actual probe on a thread makes it
> possible to run several probes in parallel, thereby cutting probing
> time.

Again, not for PCI, right?

If you want to implement this for your bus type, fine, I have no
objection to that at all, but not for PCI, it's just not worth it.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/