Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful" document

From: Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Date: Thu May 10 2007 - 12:20:33 EST


Jonathan Corbet wrote:
+The volatile storage class was originally meant for memory-mapped I/O
+registers. Within the kernel, register accesses, too, should be protected

I don't think it deserves to be added in documentation, but just for
reference: in userspace "volatile" is needed in signals (posix mandates
some variables to be volatile, as API, not as funtionality). I don't
know if this was also on the original signal handling.

Anyway user space APIs are not kernel problem ;-)

ciao
cate
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/