Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation

[H. Peter Anvin]

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> I'd be happy to have them.  While it's not the nicest API in the world
> it's in Posix and we have to support it at the library level, so we
> should better get it right.
> 
> I'd like to avoid having a big swithc statement in every filesystem,
> though, instead of we should have a table-driven approach instead
> where each filesystem defines one table (or multiple ones when it
> supports subtypes with different limits) and just sets a pointer in
> the superblock to it.
> 

This is starting to sound an awful lot like statfs().  Maybe we could
create a new statfs call which takes a buffer size input (so that we can
add new fields as time goes on) and which returns the necessary information?

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/