Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 11 May 2007 22:10:24 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > Index: linux-2.6.21/drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.21.orig/drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6.21/drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c
> > > @@ -200,10 +200,10 @@ acpi_status acpi_enter_sleep_state_prep(
> > >  		return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	status = acpi_evaluate_object(NULL, METHOD_NAME__GTS, &arg_list, NULL);
> > > +	/*status = acpi_evaluate_object(NULL, METHOD_NAME__GTS, &arg_list, NULL);
> > >  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> > >  		return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
> > > -	}
> > > +	}*/
> > >  
> > >  	/* Setup the argument to _SST */
> > >  
> > 
> > I tested this against Thomas's original patch (below).  Still hangs, in the
> > same way.
> 
> Well, I'm out of ideas. :-(
> 
> Could you please send me the Vaio's DSDT?

Maybe I should send you the Vaio ;)

I have this 1999-era pre-ACPI, pre-everything-else Dual-PIII-based
Supermicro machine and it just *always* works.  Sigh.


hm, Fedora don't seem to want to give me an RPM which contains acpidump and
all the yum servers are featuring scrogged checksums.  I could build it, I
guess, but there's a principle involved ;)

http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dsdt is /proc/acpi/dsdt.  Is that OK?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/