On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 09:47 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:On Sat, 12 May 2007 16:17:35 +0100 Richard Purdie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 13:17 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:It would be ideal if the author of that code could send us aOn Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:56:23AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:I've had a reply from the copyright holder/author saying he's going to...This sounds as if LZO is GPL incompatible similar to code under
I've asked the LZO author about the comments on lzo_copyright function
but the code is GPLv2 licensed so is suitable for inclusion in the
kernel.
the 4 clause BSD licence.
...
+/* If you use the LZO library in a product, you *must* keep this
+ * copyright string in the executable of your product.
+ */
change this wording in the next LZO release and that the code *is* GPLv2
licensed as per the headers on the files.
signed-off-by: as per secton 11 of Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
Section 11b says I can submit it but I've asked the author about a
signed off by line (he's cc'd) for the alleviation of any doubt.
Cheers,
Richard