Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?

[Satyam Sharma]

> Hello,
>
> > > [...]
> > >  config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
> > >         tristate
> > > -       default m
> > > -       depends on SCSI
> > > -       depends on MODULES
> > > +       default m if SCSI=m
> > > +       default n
> >
> > Note that this also means SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=n (will not get compiled
> > and built even as a module) if SCSI=y. But this is perfectly fine, because
> > I see:
> >
> > #ifndef MODULE
> > late_initcall(scsi_complete_async_scans);
> > #endif
> >
> > in drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c anyway, so the async scans will be waited
> > upon and get complete even when SCSI=y and scsi_scan_type=async,
> > i.e. you don't really need the scsi_wait_scan module in that case anyway.
>
> It seems there is a:
>
> late_initcall(wait_scan_init);
>
> in drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.c too. So we can get rid of the redundant:
>
> #ifndef MODULE
> late_initcal(scsi_complete_async_scans);
> #endif
>
> in drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c by enforcing SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=y when
> SCSI=y (and =m when SCSI=m).
>
> I guess this is probably the behaviour that James wanted originally?
>
> Anyway, attached patch (subsumes previous one) cleans up all this.
> Now, scsi_wait_scan is the only guy who controls waiting upon async
> scans to complete:
>
> If SCSI=n, SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=n, obviously.
>
> If SCSI=y, SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=y, so it gets built-in and is run at
> late_initcall.
>
> If SCSI=m, SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m too and would hopefully be run
> by the initrd/initramfs scripts to wait for async SCSI bus scans to
> finish before allowing the boot to proceed.
>
> [ Attached patch does _not_ expose SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to the
> user at kernel configuration time, so if somebody wants it to be
> built as a module even when SCSI=y (why would anybody
> want that, doesn't make much sense to me to modprobe
> scsi_wait_scan _after_ boot-up), it would not be possible to
> do so. But if someone really wants that, let me know, we can
> add a depends, tristate "..." and help in this Kconfig option to
> accomplish that too. ]

This has sadly become a one-person thread, but Robert informs
me in private mail that we can further clean/simplify the patch:

[subsumes both previous patches]

Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>

---

drivers/scsi/Kconfig     |    3 +--
drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c |    5 +----
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

---

diff -ruNp a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
--- a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig	2007-05-10 23:19:32.000000000 +0530
+++ b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig	2007-05-14 17:59:51.000000000 +0530
@@ -243,9 +243,8 @@ config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC

config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
	tristate
-	default m
	depends on SCSI
-	depends on MODULES
+	default SCSI

menu "SCSI Transports"
	depends on SCSI
diff -ruNp a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c	2007-05-14 16:06:43.000000000 +0530
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c	2007-05-14 16:10:34.000000000 +0530
@@ -184,14 +184,11 @@ int scsi_complete_async_scans(void)
/* Only exported for the benefit of scsi_wait_scan */
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scsi_complete_async_scans);

-#ifndef MODULE
/*
 * For async scanning we need to wait for all the scans to complete before
 * trying to mount the root fs.  Otherwise non-modular drivers may not be ready
- * yet.
+ * yet.  This is done by scsi_wait_scan.
 */
-late_initcall(scsi_complete_async_scans);
-#endif

/**
 * scsi_unlock_floptical - unlock device via a special MODE SENSE command
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/