Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon May 14 2007 - 15:46:02 EST


On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:12:24 -0500
Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If I understand this correctly:
>
> privileged thread unprivileged greedy process
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> adds new slab page from lowmem pool
> do_io()
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> ...
> eats it all
> kmem_cache_alloc(...) -> ENOMEM
> who ate my donuts?!

Yes, that's my understanding also.

I can see why it's a problem in theory, but I don't think Peter has yet
revealed to us why it's a problem in practice. I got all excited when
Christoph asked "I am not sure what the point of all of this is.", but
Peter cunningly avoided answering that ;)

What observed problem is being fixed here?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/