Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning

[Arjan van de Ven]

Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > > >semantics of it (read-only?  read-write?  write-only?
>
> Well, it _has_ to be write, don't really care if it's read-write or
> write-only. I would still prefer read-write, but we can go ahead with
> write-only too. It doesn't really matter, does it?

just to be devils advocate...
it should be a read that returns when done, and that can be polled
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/