Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboardresources

[Robert Hancock]

Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 22, 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > Eww. I don't see where we disable the decode at all while we probe the
> > BARs on the device. That seems like a bad thing, especially with the way
> > we probe 64-bit BARs (do the low 32 bits first and then the high 32
> > bits). This means the base address effectively gets set to 0xfffffff0
> > momentarily, which might cause some issues.
>
> I'm a bit shocked that things work as well as they do without the 
> disabling...
>
> > I'd try adding some code inside pci_setup_device (drivers/pci/probe.c)
> > to disable PCI_COMMAND_IO and PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY on the device when
> > probing devices with the standard header type and then restoring the
> > previous command bits afterwards, and see what effect that has. It'll be
> >   interesting if it does, since obviously it seems to work as it is with
> > non-MMCONFIG access methods. Maybe the base address being set like that
> > interferes with MMCONFIG access itself somehow?
>
> I tried that, and it seems to get past probing the graphics device at 
> least, but it hangs a bit later.  It could be that the enable/disable I 
> added wasn't correct though, I didn't check to see which one I should 
> disable in the command word, which may be a problem (just disabled them 
> both every probe).  I'll try again with more precise enable/disable 
> semantics.

It'd be interesting to see at what access it ran into trouble next, at 
least if it's consistent. Could be that some device doesn't like having 
the decode disabled..

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/