Re: [PATCH} x86_64 PM_TRACE support.

[Randy Dunlap]

On Sat, 26 May 2007 16:32:54 +1000 Nigel Cunningham wrote:

> Hi all.
> 
> As promised I took another look at the patch and at what Randy had
> prepared to fix the IA64 compilation error. I did some more work on it,
> and believe that the following is the tidiest correct solution I can
> come up with. It differs from the version that caused the compilation
> error primarily in that:
> 
> * the #include <asm/resume-trace.h> is inside the #ifdef 
>   CONFIG_PM_TRACE.
> * now-unnecessary protection for multiple #includes and ifdef testing of
>   CONFIG_PM_TRACE in the asm code were removed.
> * do-nothing definitions for !PM_TRACE restored to
>   include/linux/resume-trace.h.
> 
> We're therefore depending upon kernel/power/Kconfig having the right
> depends condition. As far as I can see, IA64 doesn't define CONFIG_X86.
> Is that correct, or do we need to have (X86 && !IA64)?

Correct, X86 is i386 and x86_64.  Not IA64.

> Randy, since this is substantially different to the work you did, I
> haven't added your signed-off-by as we previously discussed.

OK.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/