Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

[Eric Sandeen - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:17:53PM -0500]
| Andrew Morton wrote:
| 
| >Recursive lock_kernel() is OK.
| 
| Oh, it is?  Clearly I am not well versed in the BKL... that's probably a 
| good thing.... :)
| 
| Ok, let me look into it further.  I changed lock_kernel to 
| udf_lock_kernel to complain & backtrace if we re-lock, and it always 
| immediately hung after that; I assumed that was it.  I'll investigate 
| further.
| 
| -Eric
| 

Btw, Andrew is there any way to force kernel to use special UDF module
instead of compiled-in one? (Sorry for stupid question ;)

		Cyrill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/