Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Jun 1 2007 14:28, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >  > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >  > 
> > >  > Explain what we use Acked-by: for, and how it differs from Signed-off-by:
> > >  > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >  > +
> > >  > +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a
> > >  > +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can
> > >  > +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > What, no Tested-by: ?
>
>Heh. Indeed.  I think there's room for both fwiw.

Too verbose. Suggest a typedef.

	Signed-off-and-tested-by: Foo J. Bar <addy@corps>


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/