Re: Intel's response Linux/MTRR/8GB Memory Support / Why doesn't the kernel realize the BIOS has problems and re-map appropriately?

[Eric W. Biederman]

Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Friday, June 1, 2007 2:19:43 Andi Kleen wrote:
>> And normally the MTRRs win, don't they (if I remember the table correctly)
>> So if the MTRR says UC and PAT disagrees it might not actually help
>
> I just checked, yes the MTRRs win for UC types.  But it sounds like the cases 
> we're talking about are actually situations where there's no MTRR coverage, 
> so the default type is used.  The manual doesn't specifically call out how 
> memory using the default type interacts with PAT, but it may well be that it 
> stays uncached if the default type is uncached.  Again that argues for fixing 
> the MTRR mapping problem in some way.

Last I looked PAT can only demote not promote the type of a page,
except for the specific exception of UC to WC.

Normally the default type is UC so putting a pat type of WB won't
help anything.  I may have missed some subtle detail but I remember
looking into this in some detail a while ago and coming to that
conclusion.

It is the BIOS's responsibility to mark all usable memory as WB,
using the MTRRs.  If it doesn't it is a BIOS bug.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/