Re: Bad behaviour after hdparm -M 128

[Björn Steinbrink]

On 2007.06.06 13:48:54 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> > On 2007.06.06 12:44:42 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > > > >I used kernel 2.6.21 with the libata PIIX SATA driver and a
> > > > >Seagate ST98823AS drive.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, that's expected if the drive rejects the command.
> > > 
> > > Are *all* SATA drives rejecting the command?  Mine doesn't accept it,
> > > either.  And it should, AFAIK, unless IBM's HDAPS-enabled firmware started
> > > ripping out accousting management from Hitachi drives, which I don't find
> > > very likely...
> > 
> > Works here, using a WDC WD1600AAJS-00PSA0 and sata_nv.
> 
> I am also using libata PIIX like the first person reporting the problem, but
> it is a PATA drive behind a SATA-PATA bridge (it is a IBM T43 notebook).
> Hmm...

Also works fine on my T43 using ata_piix and a HTS541040G9AT00. Kernel
2.6.22-rc1.

Björn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/