Re: [PATCH 001 of 2] Fix read/truncate race.

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 12:48:48 +1000 Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The following patch will remove the extra seqlock except when we
> actually need it and remove the extra arithmetic - but I haven't
> tested it or reviewed it properly.  I can do that if you think it is
> the right direction.

Yes, the optimisation is valid and looks useful.

>  ./mm/filemap.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------

It didn't apply - your tree seems different from mine.

> +		 *
> +		 * NOTE: This access of inode->i_size is not protected
> +		 *  and if there is a concurrent update on a 32bit machine,
> +		 *  it could return the wrong value.  This could only be a problem
> +		 *  if i_size has actually changed to a smaller value before the
> +		 *  page became uptodate, and at this point it still has a smaller
> +		 *  value, but due to a race while reading, it appears unchanged.
> +		 *  The chances of this happening are so small and the consequence
> +		 *  sufficiently minor, that the cost of the seqlock seems
> +		 *  not to be justified.

please consider incorporating scripts/checkpatch.pl into your patch
preparation toolchain.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/