Re: [i2c] i2c module aliases

[Jean Delvare]

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 09:02:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:53:42PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Looks correct. However I am curious what this "i2c->id" is supposed to
> > represent, given that I2C devices do not have any form of ID as PCI or
> > USB devices have. No driver uses "MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ...)"
> > probably just because it doesn't make sense. So, rather than fixing
> > this, shouldn't we simply wipe out struct i2c_device_id? Greg, David?
> 
> If no one is using it, then yes, it should be removed.
> 
> Sorry, I added it a while ago thinking it was going to be used (I had
> test patches using it in my tree, but they never worked out in the end.)

OK. Geert, care to submit a new patch removing struct i2c_device_id
altogether?

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/