Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down

[Martin Peschke]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Firstly, submit cleanup patches that _do not change the output_. If you
> have any output changes, do it as a separate patch, ontop of the cleanup
> patch. Mixing material changes and cleanups into a single patch is a
> basic patch submission mistake that will only earn you NACKs.

Let's put this straight: it has not been my primary goal to clean it up.
I have posted an alternative implementation. One of the good things about the
alternative implementation is lines-of-savings through code sharing.

Don't hear me say my code is perfect. As anybody else here I am relying on
reviews and feedback in order to make it good enough.

I think there has been enough duplication to consider a component
that statistics data is handed over to.

Martin


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/