kconfig .po files in kernel tree? [Was: Documentation/HOWTO translated into Japanese]

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:22:21AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >  Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
> >  personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
> >  tree and then perhaps keep translations on a website somewhere. So the
> >  authoritative docs stay in the tree, in english, so that as many
> >  contributors as possible can read and update them. It would then be a
> >  seperate project to generate translations and keep them updated
> >  according to what's in the tree.  Perhaps we could get the kernel.org
> >  people to create an official space for that and then place a pointer
> >  to that site in Documentation/ somewhere.
> 
> No, I think the translated files should be in the tree proper, we have
> the space :)

We once discussed about .po files for kconfig and back then
the conclusion was not to keep them in the kernel tree.

I advocated that they should stay out back then.
But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles
having scripts/kconfig/po/da.po etc araound.

Any opinion about the .po files?

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/