Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Ingo Molnar]

* Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >* Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >  
> >>[...] Just, I asked simple question and included a simple example in 
> >>it. [...]
> >>    
> >
> >actually, what you said was this:
> >
> >" I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License"
> >  the OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL
> >  compatible.). "
> >  
> Why don't you include the last sentence I wrote: "So,we should have more 
> fruits (like ZFS,DTrace etc.) ;-) "

You might as well have said "the moon is made out of cheese" and i'd not 
have quoted it either. Why? Because it's irrelevant to the fundamental 
point that was raised and which you keep ignoring: that the only 
"example" you cited is a hypothetical that is currently false. In any 
case, speculation about what Sun might or might not do, up until the 
point it actually does it, is not something i feel compelled to do 
anything over, so please stop wasting my time by Cc:-ing me. Thanks,

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/