Re: [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works

[Jeff Dike]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 08:44:37AM +0300, Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> Okay, I don't have an x86_64, sparc64 or something similar, as my 
> computer is an x86, so I can't contradict this. If everything is fine on 
> such arches, no fix is needed when nothing's broken... though I still 
> think it's kind of ugly (though it's somehow ingenious as a hack) :)

Yeah, I would agree with that.

> Do you want me to resubmit the patch without these changes? I'll be back 
> in a few hours (got to go now) and trim this out from the patch if 
> that's necessary.

I have it in my tree now, without that set of changes.  If you want to
make the change yourself, send me a new patch, and I'll use it.
Otherwise, I'll stick with what I have now.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/