Re: Proposal: change keycode for scancode e0 32 from 150 to 172

[Vojtech Pavlik]

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:25:34AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Jiri Kosina wrote:
> >On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> >>In PS/2 mode it reports E0 32 which gets converted to keycode 150. In 
> >>USB mode it reports E0 02 which gets converted to keycode 172.
> >>I don't know if it's the keyboard itself that's being inconsistent, or 
> >>if it is the table in usbkbd.c that's broken (in which case it should be 
> >>fixed to be consistent with the keyboard in PS/2 mode.)
> >
> >Hi Peter,
> >
> >First, usbkbd.c has very probably zero business with this - the mappings 
> >are being done in hid-input.c, usbkdb.c is only for embedded/debugging 
> >cases, and is almost never used on modern systems (see the corresponding 
> >Kconfig help text).
> >
> >>You seem to be of the opinion that "usb behaviour is correct", but don't 
> >>give any motivation why usb should take precedence.  Offhand, I would 
> >>expect there to be fewer translation layers for PS/2 and would therefore 
> >>assume PS/2 is more inherently correct.
> >
> >For USB, we have Hid Usage Pages, which define this to be KEY_HOMEPAGE. 
> >There is no such specification for PS/2 though, so what Hans is proposing 
> >is to make it consistent with behavior of USB HID devices, which I agree 
> >with.
> 
> Good to hear, so as everyone smees to agree, shall I write a (massive, 
> complex, intrusive) patch to fix this, or are there until now silent 
> parties that object?

Just don't forget to update the char/keyboard.c scancode synthesis table
to generate e0 32 for keycode 172 instead for the current 150.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
Director SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/