Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
From: Alexandre Oliva
Date: Wed Jun 13 2007 - 21:05:18 EST
On Jun 13, 2007, Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now stop parroting the FSF's worn and tired tripe.
Are you playing Linus' sheeple and parroting his lines just to make a
point, or are you like that all the time? ;-)
> PS: Looking at your .sig I guess maybe you can't do that without getting
> kicked out of the FSF-LA
Don't worry, I'm not speaking even for FSFLA, and I'm entitled to my
own opinion.
I haven't consulted other FSFLA members about this. This is all my
own personal opinion.
It just so happens that I'm very closely involved in the process, I've
spent a lot of time thinking about it, and I happen to share a similar
moral and ethical background with others involved in the process, so I
arrive at similar conclusions.
And then, I influence the process myself, so it's not like some of the
arguments I brought up here weren't taken into account while creating
the GPLv3, and adopted by its other proponents.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/