Re: libertas (private) ioctls vs. nl80211

From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Thu Jun 14 2007 - 14:49:09 EST


Linus Torvalds wrote:

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I suspect that the probability of your proposal succeeding would be increased
if you could prepare a patch...
Here we go:

I don't mind ripping them out, but it makes sense only if people are actually signed up to implementing this on a higher layer. As such, I'd need to get a sign-off from somebody actually involved in wireless mesh stuff etc.

Correct me if I'm wrong, linux-wireless, but AFAIK there has never been a single post or line of code written for a generic wireless _mesh_ interface.

My general sentiment is -- remove the pointless and iw-duplicated ioctls, but leave the mesh ones that won't see generic counterparts for years.

Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/