Re: [PATCH] natsemi irq flags
From: Chuck Ebbert
Date: Fri Jun 15 2007 - 18:07:22 EST
On 06/15/2007 05:17 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> The spinlock irq flags should be a unsigned long to properly support 64 bit
Ouch. Can't we automate checking for that?
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> drivers/net/natsemi.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/natsemi.c b/drivers/net/natsemi.c
> index 4cf0d3f..460a087 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/natsemi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/natsemi.c
> @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static ssize_t natsemi_set_dspcfg_workaround(struct device *dev,
> {
> struct netdev_private *np = netdev_priv(to_net_dev(dev));
> int new_setting;
> - u32 flags;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> /* Find out the new setting */
> if (!strncmp("on", buf, count - 1) || !strncmp("1", buf, count - 1))
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/