Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jun 15, 2007, Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Friday 15 June 2007 15:28:29 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Jun 15, 2007, Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 14 June 2007 22:25:57 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> >> Is the signature not derived from the bits in the GPLed component, as
>> >> much as it is derived from the key?

>> > Actually, you can't copyright, trademark, or patent a number.

>> Agreed.  And this counter-argument of yours is a distraction.

>> I was careful to not talk about "derived work". 

> "Is the signature not derived from X as much as it is derived from Y."

> "I was careful to not talk about "derived work"."

> Which personality of yours am I currently addressing?

The one that speaks English, not Legalese.  IANAL.

Last I looked it up, "derived" was a plain-English word.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/