Re: [patch] use __asm__ and __volatile__ in i386/arm/s390byteorder.h

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 01:24 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 18 June 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 18:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > This changes asm() to __asm__() and volatile to __volatile__ so that these
> > > headers can be used with gcc's -std=c99.
> > 
> > hmm but the kernel doesn't use -std=c99...
> 
> The byteorder headers are exported to user space through
> include/asm-generic/Kbuild.asm, and they are used by a number
> of other exported headers, so they should work with any
> gcc flags that a user might want to use. 

Even those headers which are exported are _still_ kernel headersÂ. The
'caveat emptor' principle still applies to them, and we don't have to be
_that_ anal about it. GNU extensions (and proper C types, for that
matter) should be acceptable, surely?

-- 
dwmw2

 well, except perhaps for the very few headers which get included 
  directly by glibc's headers, but aren't we still pretending that
  doesn't happen?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/