You don't need to mention _all_ compatible devices in
the "compatible" property, only the few that matter;
typically the oldest one, and sometimes some intermediate
device that has extra features over the original one.
The oldest one is difficult to find out sometime. Can we only set the
self name in dts, such as "fsl, rapidio-8641", and add this 'compatible'
property to the driver ids arrays?
Such as:
static struct of_device_id of_rio_rpn_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "fsl, rapidio-8540",},
{ .compatible = "fsl, rapidio-8560",},
{ .compatible = "fsl, rapidio-8641",},
{ .compatible = "fsl, rapidio-8548",},
{},
};
How about that?
It isn't useful to add "compatible" entries that no OS
probes for.
Concrete names are good.
While I agree concrete names are good, we put these 'blocks' in so
many devices that using the device to match on is pointless.
You *definitely* should put the device name for _this_
device in there, in case it needs some special workaround.
I'm all for making up a name like 'Grande', 'Del','Janeiro'. This iseffective what we did with gianfar. The name gets picked up pretty
quickly by people.
That can be used as the "base" name, yes.
Do you have the name list? I can change my codes according them.
How about 'Mercurary', 'Venus', 'Earth', 'Mars', 'Saturn', 'Jupiter',
'Uranus', 'Neptune',
Or 'Aries', 'Taurus', 'Gemini', 'Cancer', 'Leo', 'Virgo', 'Libra',
'Scorpius', 'Sagittarius', 'Capricornus', 'Aquarius', 'Pisces' ?