Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jun 19, 2007, Anders Larsen <al@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2007-06-18 21:50:12, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> Given the ROM exception in GPLv3, I guess you could seal and
>> anti-tamper it as much as you want, and leave the ROM at such a place
>> in which it's easily replaceable but with signature checking and all
>> such that the user doesn't install ROM that is not authorized by you.

> The manufacturer must be able to _remotely_ update the device
> firmware, so as I see it (IANAL), Tivoisation _is_ a requirement.

If you take the Wikipedia definition of Tivoization, you'll see it's
about copyleft software only, and no law mandates the use of copyleft
software.  There's no end to bad laws, but a law that mandated the use
of copyleft (=> free) software and at the same time prohibited
modifications by the user would be a very contradictory one.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/