Re: [patch 11/26] SLUB: Add support for kmem_cache_ops

[Pekka Enberg]

On 6/18/07, clameter@xxxxxxx <clameter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> We use the parameter formerly used by the destructor to pass an optional
> pointer to a kmem_cache_ops structure to kmem_cache_create.
>
> kmem_cache_ops is created as empty. Later patches populate kmem_cache_ops.

I like kmem_cache_ops but I don't like this patch. I know its painful
but we really want the introduction patch to fixup the API (move ctor
to kmem_cache_ops and do the callers).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/