Re: Versioning file system

[david]

On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Lennart Sorensen wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:03:07PM -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
> > I pointed out NetApp's .snapshot directories because that's a method that
> > uses legal path character, but doesn't break anything.  With this method,
> > userspace tools will have to be taught that : is suddenly a special
> > character.  Userspace already knows that files beginning with . are special
> > and treat them specially. We don't need a new special character for every
> >  new feature.  We've got one, and it's flexible enough to do what you want,
> > as proven by NetApp's extremely successful implementation.  Perhaps you
> > want a slightly different interface from what NetApp has implemented, but
> > what you're suggesting will change the default behavior of basic tools like
> > tar and ls.  This is not a good thing.
>
> I think I used one of those systems once (or at least another one with
> .snapshot feature).  It managed to completely avoid user space problems
> by never actually showing .snapshot in directory listings, but you could
> always cd to it or refer to it explicitly.  You never risked having tar
> or find or anything else accidentally pick it up.  Very nice interface.

since anything starting with . is considered a 'hidden' file per *nix 
tradition it's ignored by many programs and optionally ignored by most 
others (and anything that doesn't ignore . files when presending files to 
the user has many other problems on modern desktop systems anyway ;-)

the only trouble I ever had with the .snapshot approach is when tar or 
find would decend down into the .snapshot when I didn't really intend for 
it to do so.

David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/