Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jun 21, 2007, "David Schwartz" <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:55:10 -0700
>> "David Schwartz" <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> > A key is a number. A signature is a number. They are neither
>> > statements nor
>> > instructions. The argument that GPLv2 prohibits Tivoization is
>> > really and
>> > truly absurd. It has neither a legal nor a moral leg to stand on.

>> A computer program is a number too.

> No, it's not. It can be expressed as a number, but it is not a number.

By this logic, then a key is a key, and a signature is a signature.
They can be expressed as numbers, sure.

> A computer program is a set of instructions to accomplish a particular
> result. It can be expressed as a number, but that doesn't mean it is a
> number.

A key is an input to a cryptographical algorithm, and a signature is
an output.  I could try to come up with more creative definitions, but
you get the idea already.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/