Re: [PATCH -rt] CONFIG_PARAVIRT and CONFIG_MCOUNT don't play welltogether

[Ingo Molnar]

* Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > thanks! I ran into this before and asked for the fastcalls to not be 
> > removed from upstream paravirt.c but to no avail it seems. It does 
> > no harm to anyone to keep the 'fastcall' declarations and 
> > definitions for places where _actual assembly code_ depends on the 
> > calling convention. Could someone please send this upstream-wards 
> > too?
> 
> Yes, I agree, it's actually documenting the subtlety of the calling 
> convention, not just noise in the source.  The upstream patch is 
> different, I'll sort one out.

great!

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/