Re: Please release a stable kernel Linux 3.0

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Friday, 22 June 2007 19:11, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 06/22/2007 11:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 22 June 2007 00:34, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >> On 06/21/2007 06:29 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >>> I myself have argued that we should be focusing more on stability and
> >>> regression fixing, but I'm not so sure that a 2.6.7 devel branch would
> >>> solve this. In general the 2.6.x.y -stable kernels seem to be doing
> >>> the job pretty good.
> >>>
> >>  
> >> Even the good ones that get lots of fixes aren't all that good. The
> >> biggest problem ATM is that suspend is badly broken and keeps getting
> >> worse...
> > 
> > Can you please provide me with any links to suspend-related bug reports from
> > you?
> > 
> 
> I get so many suspend/resume bug reports that I've given up trying
> to get them fixed. And there are so many bugs that are even worse,
> like crashes during normal use, data corruption, etc. that suspend
> bugs don't get much attention. But here are the ones for Fedora 6;
> the list would be much longer if I included Fedora 5 and 7:

Can you please tell me what's the relationship between Fedora kernel vesions
and the kernel.org kernels?

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/