Re: bugs in __schedule()

[gshan]

Satyam Sharma wrote:
> On 6/26/07, gshan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Thanks, Satyam. So I can replace the tasklet with kernel thread?
>
> That depends on what you want to do ...
>
> [ BTW: I should correct a typo in my original reply -- I should've said
> "scheduling while atomic", and not "scheduling while interrupts disabled"
> because interrupts are _not_ disabled in bottom halves, and from your
> stack backtrace it was evident that a tasklet was executing. :-) ]
I mean kernel thread could sleep, but tasklet can't. If so, it meet my 
requirements.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/