Re: [PATCH] slob: poor man's NUMA support.

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > +	if (node != -1)
> > +		page = alloc_pages_node(node, gfp, order);
> > +	else
> > +#endif
> > +		page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
> 
> Isn't the above equivalent to a bare
> 
> 	page = alloc_pages_node(node, gfp, order);
> 
> ?

No. alloc_pages follows memory policy. alloc_pages_node does not. One of 
the reasons that I want a new memory policy layer are these kinds of 
strange uses.

> 
> 	if (node < 0
> 
> rather than comparing with -1 exactly.
> 
> On many CPUs it'll save a few bytes of code.

-1 means no node specified and much of the NUMA code compares with -1.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/