Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
From: Neil Booth
Date: Wed Jun 27 2007 - 09:00:11 EST
Al Viro wrote:-
> If you want to test ICE recognition, right now only the following places
> are checking for it:
> * bitfield width
> * __attribute__((aligned(<number>)))
> * __attribute__((address_space(<number>)))
> * [<index>] in designators within initializer list
> * [<index> ... <index>] - ditto, gccism
>
> That's it. We can use it elsewhere too, but that's a separate bunch of
> patches (trivial to do now).
Bah. You don't escape that easily :)
extern int a;
struct b { unsigned int b1:(1,2); };
struct c { unsigned int c1: 1 ? 2: a++; };
are both invalid yet undiagnosed.
Neil.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/