Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API)
From: Rodolfo Giometti
Date: Thu Jun 28 2007 - 04:14:32 EST
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:08:53AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 00:46 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> > Just last question: I still don't well understand where I should
> > declare the new compat_sys_time_pps_fetch() syscall... it's
> > automagically defined by the system when CONFIG_COMPAT is enabled? :-o
>
> It isn't used on i386. On a 64-bit architecture, you need to put
> compat_sys_time_pps_fetch() into the syscall table for 32-bit
> processes.
>
> On PowerPC you do this by using COMPAT_SYS_SPU(time_pps_fetch) instead
> of SYSCALL_SPU(..) in include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h. On x86_64 you'd put
> it into the ia32_sys_call_table in arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S
I see.
Do you think I should add these functions into my patch, even if I
cannot test it, or it's enought providing just the
compat_sys_time_pps_fetch() function?
Thanks,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Device Driver giometti@xxxxxxxxx
Embedded Systems giometti@xxxxxxxx
UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/